Shared Assessments Standardized Controls Assessment: the “Swiss-Army Knife” in Your Assessment Toolbox

Shared Assessments Standardized Controls Assessment: the “Swiss-Army Knife” in Your Assessment Toolbox

Jun 4, 2020 | Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP), Standardized Control Assessment (SCA), Tools & Templates

Standardized Controls Assessment

The Shared Assessments’ Standardized Controls Assessment (Standardized Controls Assessments was previously known as the Shared Assessments’ Agreed Upon Procedure – or “AUP”) is acquiring a reputation of having utility similar to the famous Swiss army knife; a penknife housing several blades and other tools such as files, scissors, and screwdrivers. In assurance circles, it’s reportedly used not just in countless third party risk assessments to assist in verifying that a particular control exists, but also for attesting to an outsourcer’s “in-house” controls as well.

 

Pivot Point Security’s CISO and Managing partner John Very asked me recently via the Virtual CISO Podcast about ways to use the SCA beyond third party risk assessments. In the same manner that Coca-Cola is used by do-it-yourself handymen as an agent to clean chrome and other metals, many organizations are beginning to see the value of using the SCA in the self-assessment process to reviewing their own internal controls and processes.

 

The reason for this is simple: your organization is very likely a vendor to someone else and therefore the Standardized Controls Assessment is incredibly useful in helping to identify and test the effectiveness of key internal controls. The value proposition lies in the fact that as many organizations labor to adopt frameworks or to ensure adherence to certain regulations or guidance, they are finding the SCA’s controls already are mapped or aligned to the most readily referenced frameworks, regulations and guidance including ISO, NIST, and COBIT – regulations and laws from around the globe such as FFIEC, EBA, HIPAA, GDPR, and the CCPA; and industry standards such as PCI-DSS. 

 

Additionally, knowing that the SCA provides not only these test steps but additional features such as reporting templates add to the value of the tool. Lastly, an organization can have their respective internal teams such as auditors, IT security, Human Resources, etc., execute the provided test steps. If the organization would prefer an outside entity to perform this on their behalf, then an external assessment or security firm experienced in adhering to SCA Standards must perform the engagement.

 

The results of following the SCA unequivocal as it reports control gaps and allows management to make risk-based decisions to mitigating  gaps. With that design, no “opinion” is offered.

Tom Garrubba

Tom Garrubba, Vice President/CISO, Shared Assessments, is a subject matter expert, consultant, lecturer and author with 20 years of experience in IT risk, security, privacy, audit, and risk. Tom is a beloved instructor of the Certified Third Party Risk Professional (CTPRP) program. Tom is on the Forbes Technology Council and outside of work, Tom is involved with the Civil Air Patrol Squadron 603 and enjoys coaching (softball, baseball) and making music with his kids!

View all posts by Tom Garrubba


Sign up for our Newsletter

Learn about upcoming events, special offers from our partners and more.

Sub Topics

This site uses cookies

Please note that on our website we use cookies necessary for the functioning of our website, cookies that optimize the performance.
To learn more about our cookies, how we use them and their benefits, please read our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.